Do you surrender your autonomy by joining a political party?

As a citizen and a voter in our democracy, is your role to blindly follow your leader, or to use your political power (your vote) to promote and protect your values?  Are your values your own, or do you let your political party define them for you?

The Washington Post published a poll today indicating “broad support for Obama’s counterterrorism policies.”  According to the poll, even “the left wing of the Democratic Party” approves of drone attacks and indefinite detention at Guantanamo Bay.  The article almost immediately points out the irony of this:  voters chose Obama in part because he “campaigned on a pledge to close the brig at Guantanamo Bay and to change national security policies he criticized as inconsistent with U.S. law and values.”

This paragraph is worth highlighting:

“The poll shows that 53 percent of self-identified liberal Democrats — and 67 percent of moderate or conservative Democrats — support keeping Guantanamo Bay open, even though it emerged as a symbol of the post-Sept. 11 national security policies of George W. Bush, which many liberals bitterly opposed.”  (emphasis added).

Moreover, “fully 77 percent of liberal Democrats endorse the use of drones,” despite many resulting civilian casualties and its questionable legality.

It’s worth comparing the data to older polls.  Regarding Guantanamo, overall 70% of respondents agreed with President Obama on keeping Guantanamo open.  But in June 2009, more Americans favored closing the facility than keeping it open.  In 2006, only 57% of Americans supported using the Guantanamo detention center house accused terrorists.  Even in 2003, support was only at 65%.  Now, under the leadership of a President who campaigned with the promise to close the facility but reneged, support for the detention center may be at its highest level ever.

The Pew Research Center released a poll last year that demonstrated a similar shift of support by Democrats on the Patriot Act.  In 2006 under the Republican Bush, 25% of Democrats viewed the Act as a “necessary tool” and 53% thought it went too far.  Five years later under the Democrat Obama, 35% of Democrats said the Act was necessary, while only 40% thought it went too far.  Republicans, on the other hand, showed less support for the Act in 2011 than they did under Bush.

This is a very limited supply of information, ACED realizes, certainly not enough to draw firm conclusions.  However, the polling data suggests that a significant number of people who identify as belonging to a political party (a) change their values to conform to the policies of their party, and/or (b) change their values to oppose the leader of the other party.  Either is totally inconsistent with a citizen’s role in a democracy.

If you have real values, and if you hope to have any real impact with your vote; if you don’t want be a mere automaton predictably picking red or blue over and over again without regard to policy, you have to think for yourself and stand up for your values.

UPDATE:  Glenn Greenwald does a better job of covering this issue.  Similarities with his post are purely coincidental.

UPDATE 2:  Here is perhaps a more telling stat.  In February 2009, one month after Obama took office and when it was still believed he would close Guantanamo, 64% of Democrats supported its closure.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Repulsive progressive hypocrisy - Gossip Rocks Forum - February 8, 2012

    [...] [...]

  2. Repulsive progressive hypocrisy | PEOPLEUNLIKEUS - February 8, 2012

    [...] The Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy documentshow much public opinion has changed on these issues under (and as a result of) the Obama presidency: [...]

  3. Repulsive progressive hypocrisy | A New Worlds in Birth - February 9, 2012

    [...] The Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy documentshow much public opinion has changed on these issues under (and as a result of) the Obama presidency: [...]

  4. Guantánamo Bay is Popular and Going Green - Hit & Run : Reason Magazine - February 9, 2012

    [...] is actually one of its highest levels of support, even though Obama campaigned that he would close Gitmo. More [...]

  5. Liberal Silence | Scapegoats and Panaceas - February 9, 2012

    [...] Barack Obama’s militaristic policies? Barack Obama’s political party, of course. Check this out: It’s worth comparing the data to older polls.  Regarding Guantanamo, overall 70% of [...]

  6. Guantánamo Bay is Popular and Going Green | Libertarios of America - February 9, 2012

    [...] is actually one of its highest levels of support, even though Obama campaigned that he would close Gitmo. More [...]

  7. Repulsive Progressive Hypocrisy « The Oldspeak Journal - February 9, 2012

    [...] The Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy documents how much public opinion has changed on these issues under (and as a result of) the Obama [...]

  8. US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « My Sister Eileen - February 9, 2012

    [...] Glenn Greenwald and ACED showed yesterday (http://equalityanddemocracy.or…, many people probably only support these policies because they are partisan supporters of the [...]

  9. US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « Wassup? Doc!: Sid Harth - February 9, 2012

    [...] Glenn Greenwald and ACED showed yesterday (http://equalityanddemocracy.or…, many people probably only support these policies because they are partisan supporters of the [...]

  10. Why Liberals Support Indefinite Detention at Guantanamo & Drone Warfare (VIDEO) « NonviolentConflict - February 9, 2012

    [...] This is why it was appropriate for the Advocacy Center for Equality & Democracy to rhetorically pose these questions yesterday: [...]

  11. US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « …and I am Sid Harth - February 9, 2012

    [...] Glenn Greenwald and ACED showed yesterday (http://equalityanddemocracy.or…, many people probably only support these policies because they are partisan supporters of the [...]

  12. Guantánamo Bay is Popular and Going Green | My Blog - February 9, 2012

    [...] is indeed one of a top levels of support, even though Obama campaigned that he would close Gitmo. More [...]

  13. Attack the System » Blog Archive » Repulsive progressive hypocrisy - February 10, 2012

    [...] The Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy documentshow much public opinion has changed on these issues under (and as a result of) the Obama presidency: [...]

  14. “It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society.” ~Thomas Paine « Brian Browne Walker - February 11, 2012

    [...] The Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy documents how much public opinion has changed on these issues under (and as a result of) the Obama [...]

  15. Repulsive progressive hypocrisy | Vladimir Putin 2012 - February 11, 2012

    [...] The Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy documents how much public opinion has changed on these issues under (and [...]

  16. US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « Foreign Policy and I - February 12, 2012

    [...] Do you surrender your autonomy by joining a political party … [...]

  17. US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « News, Views and Reviews: Sid Harth - February 12, 2012

    [...] Do you surrender your autonomy by joining a political party … [...]

  18. US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « My Sister Eileen - February 12, 2012

    [...] Do you surrender your autonomy by joining a political party … [...]

  19. US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « Eurokrise and I - February 12, 2012

    [...] Do you surrender your autonomy by joining a political party … [...]

  20. Further Confirmation of Kerr’s Law - I Hate Paypal » I Hate Paypal - February 12, 2012

    [...] the Guantanamo Bay detention facility open.  The Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy comments: the polling data suggests that a significant number of people who identify as belonging to a [...]

  21. Further Confirmation of Kerr’s Law | FavStocks - February 13, 2012

    [...] the Guantanamo Bay detention facility open.  The Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy comments: the polling data suggests that a significant number of people who identify as belonging to a [...]

  22. Obama, Terror Policy and Bipartisan Consensus | Dispatches from the Culture Wars - February 13, 2012

    [...] to close Gitmo. Now a significant majority supports keeping it open. And that’s actually a higher level of support than even in 2003, when the war on terror was at its peak and memories of 911 were far more fresh. [...]

  23. CitizenDetention.com – Know Your Rights and Be PREPARED! - February 13, 2012

    [...] took office and promised to close the facility the number jumped to 64 percent. It’s not hard to draw the conclusion [...]

  24. The Counterterrorism Consensus | Arcana Intellego - February 14, 2012

    [...] Bay — in February 2009 just after Obama took office and promised to close the facility the number jumped to 64 percent. It’s not hard to draw the conclusion that Democrats who strongly opposed Bush-era [...]

  25. More on Team BLUE Hypocrisy | mad libertarian guy - February 14, 2012

    [...] Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy on the about face Team BLUE supporters have taken regarding their support for drone attacks and Guanta… remaining open: However, the polling data suggests that a significant number of people who identify [...]

  26. TO RENDITION JUSTICE « Pandaemonium - February 15, 2012

    [...] Bay. As the US Advocacy Centre for Equality and Democracy shows, until Obama came to power, support for the prison had steadily fallen over the previous decade. In 2003, when memories of 9/11 were still raw, 65 per cent of Americans [...]

  27. More liberal hypocrisy « EVOLVE - February 17, 2012

    [...] Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy documents how much public opinion has changed on these issues under (and as a result of) the Obama [...]

  28. Repulsive progressive hypocrisy | Conservative Talk - February 19, 2012

    [...] The Advocacy Center for Equality and Democracy documents how much public opinion has changed on these issues under (and as a result of) the Obama [...]

  29. Do you surrender your autonomy by joining a political party … -Political Fund USA - March 14, 2012

    [...] link: Do you surrender your autonomy by joining a political party … Tags: blindly-follow, leader, party-define, role, values, vote, your-leader, your-own, your-role, [...]

  30. Guantánamo Bay is Popular and Going Green | Robert Butler - March 31, 2012

    [...] is actually one of its highest levels of support, even though Obama campaigned that he would close Gitmo. More [...]